WATSON v. TIPPEN, 279 So.2d 697 (La. 1973)

HAROLD E. WATSON, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATES OF HIS MINOR SONS, BARRY WATSON AND SCOTT WATSON v. TROY LAVONE TIPPEN ET AL.

No. 53683.Supreme Court of Louisiana.
June 29, 1973.

In re: Harold E. Watson, individually and as administrator of the estates of his minor sons, Barry and Scott Watson applying for certiorari, or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Webster.

[1] Application denied. The judgment is correct. [2] TATE, J., is of the opinion that a writ should be granted since the rationale is inconsistent with those in Amy v. Henry
Hall, 227 La. 364, 79 So.2d 483 (1955) and Hickman v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co., 262 La. 102, 262 So.2d 385 (1972).