STATE OF LOUISIANA v. LAWRENCE CARPENTER. No. 88-KK-0428.Supreme Court of Louisiana. February 23, 1988. Reconsideration Denied March 11, 1988. In re Carpenter, Lawrence; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, and prohibition, mandamus, habeas corpus, supervisory and/remedial; Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court, Div. “C”, No. 88-149; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, […]
Articles Tagged: 519 So.2d 774
STATE EX REL. ALLEN v. FIFTH JUDICIAL DIST. CT., 519 So.2d 774 (La. 1988)
STATE EX REL. PHILLIP ALLEN v. FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF RICHLAND, JUDGE PRESIDING. No. 88-KH-0210.Supreme Court of Louisiana. February 24, 1988. In re Allen, Phillip; applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Richland, 5th Judicial District Court, Div. “B”. [1] The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely […]
STATE EX REL. MALATESTA v. CONNICK, 519 So.2d 774 (La. 1988)
STATE EX REL. JOSEPH MALATESTA v. HARRY CONNICK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ORLEANS. No. 88-KH-0159.Supreme Court of Louisiana. February 23, 1988. In re Malatesta, Joseph; applying for writ of mandamus; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “B”, No. 273-727. [1] Granted for the purpose of transferring the application to the district […]
STATE EX REL. MALATESTA v. CONNICK, 519 So.2d 774 (La. 1988)
STATE EX REL. JOSEPH MALATESTA v. HARRY CONNICK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ORLEANS. No. 88-KH-0159.Supreme Court of Louisiana. February 23, 1988. In re Malatesta, Joseph; applying for writ of mandamus; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “B”, No. 273-727. [1] Granted for the purpose of transferring the application to the district […]
STATE v. MADISON, 519 So.2d 774 (La. 1988)
STATE OF LOUISIANA v. DEREK MADISON. No. 88-KH-0284.Supreme Court of Louisiana. February 24, 1988. In re Madison, Derek; applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “D”. [1] The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion for production of documents he has filed […]