No. 82 CW 0837.Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.
December 21, 1982.
APPEAL FROM CITY COURT, CITY OF BATON ROUGE, STATE OF LOUISIANA, HONORABLE BYRON STRINGER, J.
Reginald F. Roberts, Jr., in pro. per.
Peter T. Dazzio, Baton Rouge, for defendant.
Before PONDER, SAVOIE and ELLIS, JJ.
PONDER, Judge.
[1] The timeliness of the appeal from City Court is the sole issue.West Page 1242
[2] Trial on the merits was had in Baton Rouge City Court on April 13, 1982. Written reasons for judgment were rendered on June 2, 1982, and mailed to the plaintiff. Plaintiff filed a motion for a new trial on June 7, 1982. Judgment was signed June 14, 1982. The record contains a certificate that notice was mailed to the plaintiff on the same day. A hearing was held on the motion for a new trial on July 15, 1982, and judgment denying the motion was rendered in the presence of plaintiff on the same day. Plaintiff’s motion for appeal filed on July 29, 1982, was denied on August 4, 1982. Plaintiff’s second motion for appeal was filed on August 13, 1982 and denied on August 18, 1982. [3] Plaintiff applied to this court for supervisory writs. An alternative writ was granted ordering the trial court to grant plaintiff’s motion for appeal, or, in the alternative, the judge or the defendant to show cause why the writ should not be made peremptory. The court has elected the alternative. [4] Under La.C.C.P. Art. 4917(A) and (B),[1] plaintiff is entitled to personal or domiciliary service of the judgment because the case was taken under advisement and he was not represented by counsel.[2] The other relevant article for notice would be La.C.C.P. Art. 1913,[3] which only requires notice by mail. La.C.C.P. Art. 4901.[4] [5] Plaintiff’s original petition requested the issuance of a temporary restraining order and rule nisi to show cause why a permanent injunction should not be issued, but no monetary damages. We find that plaintiff’s claim must fall within the cases involving damages of $3000.00 or less and he has never received the personal or domiciliary service provided by La.C.C.P. Art. 4917(B). [6] However, we must consider whether his motion for a new trial and the resulting judgment on that motion waived his right to notice of the judgment of trial on the merits. [7] La.C.C.P. Art. 5003(B) provides: [8] “Where an application for new trial is timely filed, however, the delay for appeal commences on the day after the motion is denied, or from service of notice of the order denying a new trial, when such notice is necessary.”West Page 1243
[9] Plaintiff’s motion for a new trial was filed before the final judgment was signed. When an application for a new trial is filed prematurely, it has no effect. Deville v. Babineaux, 396 So.2d 978 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1981). It therefore would not effect a waiver of service. Plaintiff’s motions for appeal were timely. [10] For these reasons, we make the writ peremptory and accordingly order that the Honorable Byron Stringer recall and vacate his ruling of August 4, 1982, denying plaintiff’s motion for appeal and grant the motion in favor of plaintiff. [11] WRIT MADE PEREMPTORY.105 La. 522 Louisiana Supreme Court R. M. Walmsley & Co. and S. P. Walmsley…
304 So.3d 86 (2020) Evan E. COOPER v. BATON ROUGE CARGO SERVICE, INC. and ABC…
PETER J. VICARI, JR. v. LINTON MELANCON. PETER J. VICARI, JR. v. ROBERT ADAMS. No.…
STATE of Louisiana v. Dartainan N. TAYLOR. No. 07-KA-474.Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit.…
STATE OF LOUISIANA EX REL. JOSEPH WOODS v. JUDGE MATTHEW BRANIFF, SECTION B, CRIMINAL DISTRICT…
STATE ex rel. Derek VANCE v. STATE of Louisiana. No. 2008-KH-0375.Supreme Court of Louisiana. November…