Chief D. W. Robison

Attorney General of Louisiana — Opinion
RELEASED SEPTEMBER 17, 1993

4 — ASSESSORS 47-A-1 — FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS 107-A — SPECIAL DISTRICTS 115 — TAXATION — Collection and enforcement against persons and property R.S. 33:221

Absent contract with municipality, fire protection district can renew taxes (by election) in areas annexed by municipality.

Chief D. W. Robison Caddo Fire District Three P.O. Box 26 Greenwood, Louisiana 71033

RICHARD P. IEYOUB

Dear Chief Robison:

You have requested an opinion of this office regarding tax receipts from areas which were removed from the assessment rolls of Caddo Fire District Three (the “District”) following annexation of those areas by the City of Shreveport. Specifically, you ask:

“May a fire protection district renew maintenance and operation taxes by election in areas which have been annexed by a municipality when the municipality and the fire protection district have not entered into a contract granting the municipality the exclusive jurisdiction to serve the annexed area?”

In our opinion, a fire protection district that has not contracted with the annexing municipality can renew its taxes for the areas annexed, as long as the election is held throughout the district, including the annexed areas, and the voters approve the tax renewal.

This question was addressed by this office in Attorney General’s Opinion No. 92-296, copy enclosed. That opinion quotes R.S. 33:221, relative to contracts between municipalities and special service districts when both have the right to provide service to a particular area. In pertinent part the opinion states:

“By providing municipalities and service districts with a right to contract, the legislature has recognized that in absence of a contract granting jurisdiction to the municipality, the districts have the right to provide services (and levy taxes) in annexed area.

* * *

“. . . it is only when the municipality and the special service district enter into a contract and agree that the municipality will have exclusive jurisdiction to serve the annexed area that the district must cease levying maintenance taxes therein . . .”.

Trusting the above information adequately responds to your request, I am,

Yours very truly,

RICHARD P. IEYOUB Attorney General
BY: JEANNE-MARIE ZERINGUE Assistant Attorney General

RPI:JMZ:jav/193n

cc: Dannye Malone Caddo Parish Attorney

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: 93-564

Recent Posts

R. M. WALMSLEY & CO. v. RESWEBER, 105 La. 522 (1901)

105 La. 522 Louisiana Supreme Court R. M. Walmsley & Co. and S. P. Walmsley…

3 years ago

COOPER v. BATON ROUGE CARGO SERVICE, INC., 304 So.3d 86 (2020)

304 So.3d 86 (2020) Evan E. COOPER v. BATON ROUGE CARGO SERVICE, INC. and ABC…

3 years ago

VICARI v. MELANCON, 448 So.2d 115 (La. 1984)

PETER J. VICARI, JR. v. LINTON MELANCON. PETER J. VICARI, JR. v. ROBERT ADAMS. No.…

7 years ago

STATE v. TAYLOR, 07-474 (La.App. 5 Cir. 12/27/07); 975 So.2d 10

STATE of Louisiana v. Dartainan N. TAYLOR. No. 07-KA-474.Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit.…

7 years ago

STATE EX REL. WOODS v. BRANIFF, 406 So.2d 592 (La. 1981)

STATE OF LOUISIANA EX REL. JOSEPH WOODS v. JUDGE MATTHEW BRANIFF, SECTION B, CRIMINAL DISTRICT…

7 years ago

STATE v. STATE, 2008-0375 (La. 11/10/08); 996 So.2d 1061

STATE ex rel. Derek VANCE v. STATE of Louisiana. No. 2008-KH-0375.Supreme Court of Louisiana. November…

7 years ago